התפיסות הבסיסיות שברקע הרעיון - מה"ב

​

1. Most of the people who have come and are coming in fierce struggles for power, throughout human history, people who have aspired and desired and tirelessly strived to have great power and influence in government, they necessarily were and are those who are the most unworthy and most unsuitable for power (the detailed description of the above phenomenon is at the level of an extreme case, which has prevailed in Israel for many years).

2. The reason for 1 above lies in said people's character, which is endowed with a survivalist psychological motive to achieve a prominent and powerful position in human society, as a result of their existential need, on the one hand, for appreciation, respect, and even admiration from a large audience, and on the other hand, the intense need for the power necessary to preserve this position and the significant personal benefits that accompany it.

3. The character in question of those who are unfit for power, as stated, invariably stems from deep deprivations in their lives, which leads them to an emotional structure in which they need external confirmation of who they are and, more importantly, who they fantasize about being. Such people are endowed with a great talent for manipulation and sophistication in front of the public, whose complete recognition they aspire to, usually using messages that activate a collective fear of threats, which they diligently strengthen in the consciousness of the public of their subjects.

4. The deep need for external approval leads to a principled position, as it is expressed in their rule, towards that part of the public that is their political "base", a position that dictates to them activity to constantly clarify the will and desires of the majority in this base, while building a quasi-group-"sectoral" relationship with it. These relationships also include complexities such as the manipulative direction of the preferences and positions of the majority in their base, all in order to please it, in a kind of roundabout deal, thereby ensuring its support in the future.

5. The appeasement of the political base is carried out steadily, but necessarily at a heavy cost in creating a barrier and separation and rejection and systematic ignoring of the material and spiritual well-being of those in the public who oppose the government in question. This is the consciously inseparable "anti-state" effect of this type of government.

6. The emphasis here is on what is evident from this, which is the characteristic of anti-leadership, in which the government adapts itself to the public, in the circular interactions described above, instead of leading it according to a political platform and ideology for the implementation of which the government was supposed to be elected in the first place. A clear sign of this type of government is that it presents its candidacy without any defined platform to the public, in order to leave open all the procedural "options" required to establish its rule.

7. The result of the above, without exception, over time, is a conflicted society divided into sectors, to the point of real and irreversible damage to the existence of the state, mainly due to the collapse of social solidarity in it, as we are experiencing in Israel at unprecedented heights, right this year.

8. Such developments have also occurred in other places in the world, because the psychological motivations in question among people striving for power and influence are universal, so we find a common denominator in this aspect with Trump's USA 2020 and its real approach to the "North-South" division again, as happened in the Civil War there in 1861-65.

9. It should be emphasized that the above is in addition to the fact that Trump had and has a certain ideology, which exists as it is clear or mixed, even if his personality is unsettling and unrestrained and even if the ideology itself is in extreme controversy, while in our country, the head of the ruling party does not have any ideology, not even the most minimal, in addition to the severe lack of restraint that characterizes him and the destabilization that he instills, as a method, in all of Israeli society.